0.03/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.14/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IC5OSib3ig true 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 960 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 120 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 02:23:00 EDT 2022 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.36 % Running portfolio for 960 s 0.15/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.15/0.36 % Number of cores: 8 0.15/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.15/0.36 % Running in HO mode 0.63/0.72 % Total configuration time : 828 0.63/0.72 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.63/0.72 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.63/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.64/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 0.64/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 0.64/0.84 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 0.64/0.85 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 0.64/0.85 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 0.64/0.86 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 0.64/0.86 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 0.65/0.94 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s 0.65/0.94 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s 0.65/0.97 % Solved by lams/40_noforms.sh. 0.65/0.97 % done 13 iterations in 0.066s 0.65/0.97 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 0.65/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation 0.65/0.97 thf(icl_atom_type, type, icl_atom: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(icl_false_type, type, icl_false: $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(sk__2_type, type, sk__2: $i > ($i > $o) > $i). 0.65/0.97 thf(sk__5_type, type, sk__5: $i). 0.65/0.97 thf(mnot_type, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(rel_type, type, rel: $i > $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(icl_impl_type, type, icl_impl: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(sk__6_type, type, sk__6: $i). 0.65/0.97 thf(mfalse_type, type, mfalse: $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(mvalid_type, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(mbox_type, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(icl_says_type, type, icl_says: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(s_type, type, s: $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(iclval_type, type, iclval: ($i > $o) > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(mimpl_type, type, mimpl: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(mor_type, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.65/0.97 thf(mvalid, axiom,(( mvalid ) = (^[P:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( P @ W ) )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('0', plain, (( mvalid ) = ( ^[P:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( P @ W ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mvalid])). 0.65/0.97 thf('1', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( mvalid ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( ![X4:$i]: ( V_1 @ X4 ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf(mbox, axiom,(( mbox ) = 0.65/0.97 (^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),P:( $i > $o ),X:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ![Y:$i]: ( ( R @ X @ Y ) => ( P @ Y ) ) )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('2', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( mbox ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),P:( $i > $o ),X:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ![Y:$i]: ( ( R @ X @ Y ) => ( P @ Y ) ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mbox])). 0.65/0.97 thf('3', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( mbox ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ![X4:$i]: ( ( V_1 @ V_3 @ X4 ) => ( V_2 @ X4 ) ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf(mimpl, axiom,(( mimpl ) = 0.65/0.97 (^[U:( $i > $o ),V:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ U ) @ V )))). 0.65/0.97 thf(mor, axiom,(( mor ) = 0.65/0.97 (^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) | ( Y @ U ) )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('4', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( mor ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) | ( Y @ U ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mor])). 0.65/0.97 thf('5', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( mor ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ( V_1 @ V_3 ) | ( V_2 @ V_3 ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf(mnot, axiom,(( mnot ) = (^[X:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ~( X @ U ) )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('6', plain, (( mnot ) = ( ^[X:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ~( X @ U ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mnot])). 0.65/0.97 thf('7', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( mnot ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:$i]: ( ~( V_1 @ V_2 ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf('8', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( mimpl ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[U:( $i > $o ),V:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ U ) @ V ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mimpl, '5', '7'])). 0.65/0.97 thf('9', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( mimpl ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ V_1 ) @ V_2 ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf(refl_axiom, axiom, 0.65/0.97 (![A:( $i > $o )]: ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ rel @ A ) @ A ) ))). 0.65/0.97 thf(zf_stmt_0, axiom, 0.65/0.97 (![X4:( $i > $o ),X6:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ( ~( ![X8:$i]: ( ( rel @ X6 @ X8 ) => ( X4 @ X8 ) ) ) ) | ( X4 @ X6 ) ))). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, 0.65/0.97 (![X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i]: (~ (X0 @ (sk__2 @ X1 @ X0)) | (X0 @ X1))), 0.65/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, 0.65/0.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i > $o]: ( (rel @ X0 @ (sk__2 @ X0 @ X1)) | (X1 @ X0))), 0.65/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl66, plain, 0.65/0.97 (![X0 : $i]: ( (rel @ X0 @ X0) | (rel @ X0 @ X0))), 0.65/0.97 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl1])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl79, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (rel @ X0 @ X0)), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl66])). 0.65/0.97 thf(icl_s4_valid, axiom,(( iclval ) = (^[X:( $i > $o )]: ( mvalid @ X )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('10', plain, (( iclval ) = ( ^[X:( $i > $o )]: ( mvalid @ X ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [icl_s4_valid, '1'])). 0.65/0.97 thf('11', plain, (( iclval ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( mvalid @ V_1 ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf(icl_says, axiom,(( icl_says ) = 0.65/0.97 (^[A:( $i > $o ),S:( $i > $o )]: ( mbox @ rel @ ( mor @ A @ S ) )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('12', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( icl_says ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[A:( $i > $o ),S:( $i > $o )]: ( mbox @ rel @ ( mor @ A @ S ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [icl_says, '3', '5'])). 0.65/0.97 thf('13', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( icl_says ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o )]: 0.65/0.97 ( mbox @ rel @ ( mor @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])).thf(icl_false, axiom,(( icl_false ) = (mfalse))). 0.65/0.97 thf(mfalse, axiom,(( mfalse ) = (^[X:$i]: ( $false )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('14', plain, (( mfalse ) = ( ^[X:$i]: ( $false ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mfalse])). 0.65/0.97 thf('15', plain, (( mfalse ) = ( ^[V_1:$i]: ( $false ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf('16', plain, (( icl_false ) = ( mfalse )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [icl_false, '15'])). 0.65/0.97 thf('17', plain, (( icl_false ) = ( mfalse )), define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf(icl_impl, axiom,(( icl_impl ) = 0.65/0.97 (^[A:( $i > $o ),B:( $i > $o )]: ( mbox @ rel @ ( mimpl @ A @ B ) )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('18', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( icl_impl ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[A:( $i > $o ),B:( $i > $o )]: ( mbox @ rel @ ( mimpl @ A @ B ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], 0.65/0.97 [icl_impl, '3', '9', '5', '7'])). 0.65/0.97 thf('19', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( icl_impl ) = 0.65/0.97 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o )]: 0.65/0.97 ( mbox @ rel @ ( mimpl @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf(icl_atom, axiom,(( icl_atom ) = (^[P:( $i > $o )]: ( mbox @ rel @ P )))). 0.65/0.97 thf('20', plain, (( icl_atom ) = ( ^[P:( $i > $o )]: ( mbox @ rel @ P ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [icl_atom, '3'])). 0.65/0.97 thf('21', plain, 0.65/0.97 (( icl_atom ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( mbox @ rel @ V_1 ) )), 0.65/0.97 define([status(thm)])). 0.65/0.97 thf(trust, conjecture, 0.65/0.97 (iclval @ 0.65/0.97 ( icl_impl @ 0.65/0.97 ( icl_says @ icl_false @ ( icl_atom @ s ) ) @ ( icl_atom @ s ) ))). 0.65/0.97 thf(zf_stmt_1, conjecture, 0.65/0.97 (![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ( rel @ X4 @ X6 ) => 0.65/0.97 ( ( ~( ![X8:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ( rel @ X6 @ X8 ) => 0.65/0.97 ( ![X10:$i]: ( ( rel @ X8 @ X10 ) => ( s @ X10 ) ) ) ) ) ) | 0.65/0.97 ( ![X12:$i]: ( ( rel @ X6 @ X12 ) => ( s @ X12 ) ) ) ) ))). 0.65/0.97 thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture, 0.65/0.97 (~( ![X4:$i,X6:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ( rel @ X4 @ X6 ) => 0.65/0.97 ( ( ~( ![X8:$i]: 0.65/0.97 ( ( rel @ X6 @ X8 ) => 0.65/0.97 ( ![X10:$i]: ( ( rel @ X8 @ X10 ) => ( s @ X10 ) ) ) ) ) ) | 0.65/0.97 ( ![X12:$i]: ( ( rel @ X6 @ X12 ) => ( s @ X12 ) ) ) ) ) )), 0.65/0.97 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, 0.65/0.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: 0.65/0.97 (~ (rel @ X0 @ X1) | (s @ X1) | ~ (rel @ sk__5 @ X0))), 0.65/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl99, plain, 0.65/0.97 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (rel @ sk__5 @ X0) | (s @ X0))), 0.65/0.97 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl79, zip_derived_cl5])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (~ (s @ sk__6)), 0.65/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl105, plain, (~ (rel @ sk__5 @ sk__6)), 0.65/0.97 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl99, zip_derived_cl6])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain, ( (rel @ sk__5 @ sk__6)), 0.65/0.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 0.65/0.97 thf(zip_derived_cl111, plain, ($false), 0.65/0.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl105, zip_derived_cl7])). 0.65/0.97 0.65/0.97 % SZS output end Refutation 0.65/0.97 0.65/0.97 0.65/0.97 % Terminating... 0.66/1.06 % Runner terminated. 2.13/1.08 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 2.13/1.08 EOF